<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sovereign Grace Ministries on Polity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/</link>
	<description>a haven for castaways, a call for reform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:07:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6709</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6709</guid>
		<description>I remember a friend in my PDI days talking with me about having relations with her husband (not me, her - hee-hee - that didn&#039;t sound right).  There were times she didn&#039;t feel like it, but she said she learned this:  she could spend alot of time arguing with him about how tired she was, or she could submit and it would be over in 15 minutes.

That, dear friends, is what &quot;duty&quot; is...ugh.

John, hearing a man take up for us is so refreshing.  Like Ellie said, whatta guy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember a friend in my PDI days talking with me about having relations with her husband (not me, her &#8211; hee-hee &#8211; that didn&#8217;t sound right).  There were times she didn&#8217;t feel like it, but she said she learned this:  she could spend alot of time arguing with him about how tired she was, or she could submit and it would be over in 15 minutes.</p>
<p>That, dear friends, is what &#8220;duty&#8221; is&#8230;ugh.</p>
<p>John, hearing a man take up for us is so refreshing.  Like Ellie said, whatta guy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellie</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6707</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6707</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don’t make a good SGM wife, sorry, I’m not quiet demure, freshened up, and I don’t service my husband nor does he want to be serviced. Just the term is ikky.&quot;

DB, it is IKKY!! I think of a mechanic&#039;s garage when I hear that term - &quot;servicing&quot; is for CARS....

Yayyyyyyyyyyyy, John!! Whatta guy!!! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t make a good SGM wife, sorry, I’m not quiet demure, freshened up, and I don’t service my husband nor does he want to be serviced. Just the term is ikky.&#8221;</p>
<p>DB, it is IKKY!! I think of a mechanic&#8217;s garage when I hear that term &#8211; &#8220;servicing&#8221; is for CARS&#8230;.</p>
<p>Yayyyyyyyyyyyy, John!! Whatta guy!!! <img src='http://sgmrefuge.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A woman of duty</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6706</link>
		<dc:creator>A woman of duty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6706</guid>
		<description>John,
Wow John...that was wonderful!  From a woman who use to be under &quot;duty&quot; and I dont know how I will ever getting over the feeling of filthiness.  I bowed to my disgusting husband,  thinking I was being a dutiful, serving, godly wife...but there is hope as a man like you &quot;Cowboy&#039;s Up&quot; to the truth and abuses.
I praise God you are here brother.  Please continue to be an advocate.  Coming from a man means alot more to other men than it coming from a woman.  Sad but true...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
Wow John&#8230;that was wonderful!  From a woman who use to be under &#8220;duty&#8221; and I dont know how I will ever getting over the feeling of filthiness.  I bowed to my disgusting husband,  thinking I was being a dutiful, serving, godly wife&#8230;but there is hope as a man like you &#8220;Cowboy&#8217;s Up&#8221; to the truth and abuses.<br />
I praise God you are here brother.  Please continue to be an advocate.  Coming from a man means alot more to other men than it coming from a woman.  Sad but true&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acme</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6698</link>
		<dc:creator>acme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6698</guid>
		<description>You go, John!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You go, John!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Immel</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6688</link>
		<dc:creator>John Immel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6688</guid>
		<description>Work in progress… 
Interesting quote.  The funny thing is … absent the other doctrinal over head this would actually be good advice … sort of.  
 
 
Julie… your evaluation and your experience is both heart breaking and illustrative.  You are exactly right… your husband was looking for a real woman. Maybe better said, He was looking for you to be FREE to be that Real woman. Which you were never allowed to be.  
 
Let me back up and add a few comments before I proceed.  Here is my take on Sex.  Sex is an end not a means.  Sex requires a man and a woman to stand physically naked to be sure, but more importantly it requires them to stand spiritually, emotionally, and intellectually naked.    Sex is a function of EGO, an absolute barometer of individual identity.  
 
If a man beds and endless string of sluts. I can tell you immediately what he really thinks of himself.  If a man merges himself with a woman of profound moral, intellectual and physiological power I can tell you what he thinks of himself.  If a man is willing to pay for sex, I can tell you what he really thinks of himself.  Whatever a man feels he needs to do to acquire sex is a direct reflection of what he really feels of himself. 
 
As a result sexual attraction reflects our deepest vision of ourselves and our most potent sense of self esteem.   
 
And here in are most all sexual issues played out.  Men and women surrender to one another to ANNOUNCE a sense of self OR to COUNTERFEIT a sense of self. 
 
Why do men who sleep with a string of low women eventually say they found it empty?  The sex may have been fun but not satisfying.  This is no real mystery. Those men went looking for something to affirm their value.  The believed that female attention would be an effective measure of that value, only to crawl out of bed and realize they found none.  How is that possible? Easy … their partner had no value to reflect.  The very thing that made her take off her cloths (her lack of personal value) is the very thing that made it impossible for her to reflect value back to the man.  
 
Or notice the converse… the man who has no value inside himself and hits a place in life where he realizes such value important but can’t get those values for himself.  He goes to a church and finds a “good church girl” assuming that by bedding her, he will take on the substance of her virtue.  Only to find in short order that he is board with her and goes to a prostitute to find release.  
 
Of course this is why so many men get all fussy about good looking women, particularly if they are married to them.  They don’t honestly believe they present enough value to keep the woman occupied.  They become threatened by her beauty, so they must control every expression of her individuality. The corresponding condemnation crushes the woman into systematic defacement.   And then one day, the man looks around and says: “you are not beautiful to me anymore… I’m leaving.”
 
Idiot! It is your own fault.  You made her utterly despise her beauty, her attractiveness, her desirability and when she finally crushes it out of herself you feel cheated.  
 
Idiot!  Idiot! Idiioooootttt! 
 
God made women beautiful.  But more importantly he made them desirable and even more important that than He made them to WANT to be desired.  There was a commercial some years ago (Hair Care I think) that said:  “you don’t flirt when he looks good… you flirt when you think YOU look good.”  This is sooo true.  Energizing a marriage with sexual energy is directly proportional to freeing a woman to be confident in HER.  HER EGO.  HER SELF.  HER VALUE.  HER DESIRABILITY.   
 
Start foreplay in the kitchen. Get out the candles. Turn on the music. BOOOM!
 
And this is the true tragedy in the SGM body of doctrine they set out to make this God Given, God breathed desire … to make it a manifest evil of selfish desire.  And the moment they do they create the very vacuum that causes marital disaster.  Women will naturally seek to be desirable to their man … all he has to do is affirm to them that he values who they are and have fun, fun, fun showing the affirmation.  Cindy Lopper had it sooo right. “Girls just wanna have fun!”  And a few dozen orgasms doesn’t hurt. 
 
Oppps… wrong crowd??? 
 
Julie… you were (past tense) were robbed of your desirability, all in the name of motivational purity.  They made beauty a curse and desirably a selfish ambition and the result was catastrophic.  Because sexuality is an absolute reflection of self, it can’t be done out of duty.  Drop the duty bomb in the bedroom and I grantee impotence and frigidity.  Make is a celebration of Ego... and you won’t be able to keep your hands of each other. 
 
All of the catastrophe is based on the premise that MEN can’t control themselves and need their masculine inferiority fed, bandaged and coddled. 
 
Ridiculous, I’m so heterosexual it hurts.  If I can get it done.  EVERYBODY else can.  If nothing else I absolve all woman of MY LUST and MY Masculine inferiority.  Its mine... Wear what you want.  I will applaud your beauty and the Glory you reflect for your mate match and partner in life, and deal with my own pressure thank you very much.  
 
Anyway … that is my 1.05 cents worth. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Work in progress…<br />
Interesting quote.  The funny thing is … absent the other doctrinal over head this would actually be good advice … sort of. <br />
 <br />
 <br />
Julie… your evaluation and your experience is both heart breaking and illustrative.  You are exactly right… your husband was looking for a real woman. Maybe better said, He was looking for you to be FREE to be that Real woman. Which you were never allowed to be. <br />
 <br />
Let me back up and add a few comments before I proceed.  Here is my take on Sex.  Sex is an end not a means.  Sex requires a man and a woman to stand physically naked to be sure, but more importantly it requires them to stand spiritually, emotionally, and intellectually naked.    Sex is a function of EGO, an absolute barometer of individual identity.  <br />
 <br />
If a man beds and endless string of sluts. I can tell you immediately what he really thinks of himself.  If a man merges himself with a woman of profound moral, intellectual and physiological power I can tell you what he thinks of himself.  If a man is willing to pay for sex, I can tell you what he really thinks of himself.  Whatever a man feels he needs to do to acquire sex is a direct reflection of what he really feels of himself.<br />
 <br />
As a result sexual attraction reflects our deepest vision of ourselves and our most potent sense of self esteem.   <br />
 <br />
And here in are most all sexual issues played out.  Men and women surrender to one another to ANNOUNCE a sense of self OR to COUNTERFEIT a sense of self.<br />
 <br />
Why do men who sleep with a string of low women eventually say they found it empty?  The sex may have been fun but not satisfying.  This is no real mystery. Those men went looking for something to affirm their value.  The believed that female attention would be an effective measure of that value, only to crawl out of bed and realize they found none.  How is that possible? Easy … their partner had no value to reflect.  The very thing that made her take off her cloths (her lack of personal value) is the very thing that made it impossible for her to reflect value back to the man. <br />
 <br />
Or notice the converse… the man who has no value inside himself and hits a place in life where he realizes such value important but can’t get those values for himself.  He goes to a church and finds a “good church girl” assuming that by bedding her, he will take on the substance of her virtue.  Only to find in short order that he is board with her and goes to a prostitute to find release. <br />
 <br />
Of course this is why so many men get all fussy about good looking women, particularly if they are married to them.  They don’t honestly believe they present enough value to keep the woman occupied.  They become threatened by her beauty, so they must control every expression of her individuality. The corresponding condemnation crushes the woman into systematic defacement.   And then one day, the man looks around and says: “you are not beautiful to me anymore… I’m leaving.”<br />
 <br />
Idiot! It is your own fault.  You made her utterly despise her beauty, her attractiveness, her desirability and when she finally crushes it out of herself you feel cheated. <br />
 <br />
Idiot!  Idiot! Idiioooootttt!<br />
 <br />
God made women beautiful.  But more importantly he made them desirable and even more important that than He made them to WANT to be desired.  There was a commercial some years ago (Hair Care I think) that said:  “you don’t flirt when he looks good… you flirt when you think YOU look good.”  This is sooo true.  Energizing a marriage with sexual energy is directly proportional to freeing a woman to be confident in HER.  HER EGO.  HER SELF.  HER VALUE.  HER DESIRABILITY.  <br />
 <br />
Start foreplay in the kitchen. Get out the candles. Turn on the music. BOOOM!<br />
 <br />
And this is the true tragedy in the SGM body of doctrine they set out to make this God Given, God breathed desire … to make it a manifest evil of selfish desire.  And the moment they do they create the very vacuum that causes marital disaster.  Women will naturally seek to be desirable to their man … all he has to do is affirm to them that he values who they are and have fun, fun, fun showing the affirmation.  Cindy Lopper had it sooo right. “Girls just wanna have fun!”  And a few dozen orgasms doesn’t hurt.<br />
 <br />
Oppps… wrong crowd???<br />
 <br />
Julie… you were (past tense) were robbed of your desirability, all in the name of motivational purity.  They made beauty a curse and desirably a selfish ambition and the result was catastrophic.  Because sexuality is an absolute reflection of self, it can’t be done out of duty.  Drop the duty bomb in the bedroom and I grantee impotence and frigidity.  Make is a celebration of Ego&#8230; and you won’t be able to keep your hands of each other.<br />
 <br />
All of the catastrophe is based on the premise that MEN can’t control themselves and need their masculine inferiority fed, bandaged and coddled.<br />
 <br />
Ridiculous, I’m so heterosexual it hurts.  If I can get it done.  EVERYBODY else can.  If nothing else I absolve all woman of MY LUST and MY Masculine inferiority.  Its mine&#8230; Wear what you want.  I will applaud your beauty and the Glory you reflect for your mate match and partner in life, and deal with my own pressure thank you very much. <br />
 <br />
Anyway … that is my 1.05 cents worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6681</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6681</guid>
		<description>Same here with regard to satisfaction with what I have now compared to the past when we had roles to fill.

I don&#039;t make a good SGM wife, sorry, I&#039;m not quiet demure, freshened up, and I don&#039;t service my husband nor does he want to be serviced. Just the term is ikky.

And, do caregroup leaders just pick bad books. I remember in the 80&#039;s reading a wretched rag entitled, &quot;Creative Counterpart,&quot; by Linda Dillow. She couldn&#039;t even tell the reader (in the first edition,) that if her husband orders her to have an abortion to say no. No, she goes on and on ad tedium about how you could just please him more, give him attnetion, and this is almost if not a direct quote, &quot;we can be creative if we try hard enough.&quot;

Just trust me when I say the bile rises in my throat. 

But it&#039;s a reflection of women in the eyes of patrists. Equal in worth and different in roles rings true like separate but equal in the Jim Crow south. Yeah, would you want to send your kids to a &quot;colored,&quot; school or take a dump in the &quot;colored,&quot; bathroom? I seriously doubt it well, what have the women been offered when the men get to have all the fun?  (crickets chirping.........)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here with regard to satisfaction with what I have now compared to the past when we had roles to fill.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t make a good SGM wife, sorry, I&#8217;m not quiet demure, freshened up, and I don&#8217;t service my husband nor does he want to be serviced. Just the term is ikky.</p>
<p>And, do caregroup leaders just pick bad books. I remember in the 80&#8217;s reading a wretched rag entitled, &#8220;Creative Counterpart,&#8221; by Linda Dillow. She couldn&#8217;t even tell the reader (in the first edition,) that if her husband orders her to have an abortion to say no. No, she goes on and on ad tedium about how you could just please him more, give him attnetion, and this is almost if not a direct quote, &#8220;we can be creative if we try hard enough.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just trust me when I say the bile rises in my throat. </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s a reflection of women in the eyes of patrists. Equal in worth and different in roles rings true like separate but equal in the Jim Crow south. Yeah, would you want to send your kids to a &#8220;colored,&#8221; school or take a dump in the &#8220;colored,&#8221; bathroom? I seriously doubt it well, what have the women been offered when the men get to have all the fun?  (crickets chirping&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6676</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6676</guid>
		<description>John,

Thanks.  You are a true gentleman in how you post.  It is also encouraging to know that any of us had some small part in helping even one person recognize the controlling leadership they were under.  I also, as a woman, appreciated the presepective you showed us in your post about how women are treated.  It is nice to have a man voice the things we women have been saying for a while.  The treatment we were subject to made me feel &quot;dirty&quot;, without understanding why.  It as quite a horrible feeling.


Julie said, &lt;strong&gt;&quot;Though SGM told him what he wanted in a wife, deep down he wanted a real woman.  And that’s exactly what he’s got now, and we are both much much happier both in the bedroom and out.  And might I add I now have a real man!   He doesn’t scamper around at the foot of any man with his tail between his legs anymore.  He certainly doesn’t defend ‘manly’ leaders against injured women and children.&quot;

&lt;/strong&gt;Right on, sister!  I had the same experience with my husband.  It finally &quot;clicked&quot; on what he really needed in me, and vice versa.  That only happened after we left the controlling influences we were under.  

I LOVE being married to him, 25 years in April.  We have true companionship based on love and respect for each other.  I find we do not have to discuss &quot;authority&quot; or &quot;submission&quot;.  We spend alot more time talking about God, having fun together.  Why, he is such a blessed man because I love to watch football with him. 

 Last night, I was even watching a bit of UFC wrestling with him.  He was explaining what the moves were, who was winning, etc.  Of course, I was getting a back rub during the show, so I probably would have watched anything at that point.  But it was really fun.  There is such a balance, and we enjoy each other.  So different from the old days in our controlling church (I will add, to be fair, that we learned some good things about marriage and child-rearing, back before things got too controlling.  For that, I am grateful). :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Thanks.  You are a true gentleman in how you post.  It is also encouraging to know that any of us had some small part in helping even one person recognize the controlling leadership they were under.  I also, as a woman, appreciated the presepective you showed us in your post about how women are treated.  It is nice to have a man voice the things we women have been saying for a while.  The treatment we were subject to made me feel &#8220;dirty&#8221;, without understanding why.  It as quite a horrible feeling.</p>
<p>Julie said, <strong>&#8220;Though SGM told him what he wanted in a wife, deep down he wanted a real woman.  And that’s exactly what he’s got now, and we are both much much happier both in the bedroom and out.  And might I add I now have a real man!   He doesn’t scamper around at the foot of any man with his tail between his legs anymore.  He certainly doesn’t defend ‘manly’ leaders against injured women and children.&#8221;</p>
<p></strong>Right on, sister!  I had the same experience with my husband.  It finally &#8220;clicked&#8221; on what he really needed in me, and vice versa.  That only happened after we left the controlling influences we were under.  </p>
<p>I LOVE being married to him, 25 years in April.  We have true companionship based on love and respect for each other.  I find we do not have to discuss &#8220;authority&#8221; or &#8220;submission&#8221;.  We spend alot more time talking about God, having fun together.  Why, he is such a blessed man because I love to watch football with him. </p>
<p> Last night, I was even watching a bit of UFC wrestling with him.  He was explaining what the moves were, who was winning, etc.  Of course, I was getting a back rub during the show, so I probably would have watched anything at that point.  But it was really fun.  There is such a balance, and we enjoy each other.  So different from the old days in our controlling church (I will add, to be fair, that we learned some good things about marriage and child-rearing, back before things got too controlling.  For that, I am grateful). <img src='http://sgmrefuge.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: work-in-progress</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6675</link>
		<dc:creator>work-in-progress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6675</guid>
		<description>Found it:



(Betsy Ricucci writes) &lt;i&gt;Before I was married, I never left the house looking bad . . . but you should have seen me in the house!  I didn’t bother freshening up, wearing makeup, or fixing my hair.  And I’m afraid I took those habits with me into marriage.  It took a close friend’s example and encouragement to help me change.  If I want my husband to desire me, I need to look desirable.  These things have become important to me because I want to treat Gary with real respect.
 
Women often pay less attention to their appearance after they get married.  &lt;b&gt;Yet our appearance is more important now than ever.  Most of our husbands work in an environment where they are surrounded by women striving to look attractive.&lt;/b&gt;  We need to look attractive when they leave for work and when they come home.  Attractive undergarments and nightwear are also important.  It takes effort to look good, especially if you have small children.  There will inevitably be those crazy days when you barely get out of your robe.  But on the whole we need to attend to our appearance.  This is a tangible and meaningful way to express love and respect for our husbands. - Love That Lasts&lt;/i&gt;, p. 149 (emphasis mine)

There are a lot of red flags in that passage - and in the entire book - but I was particularly struck by the comment about attractive women working with husbands in the workplace.  As though it&#039;s some sort of competition to keep one&#039;s husband&#039;s attention.  You must be sexier than the women your husband work with, otherwise . . . it&#039;s never said explicitly, but the obvious implication is that he will stray if you don&#039;t keep your appearance up.

The lines about wearing attractive &quot;underwear and nightwear&quot; line up with what Julie said about how wives were told to shop for lingerie, etc.  And the passage clearly implies that wearing makeup around the house is the godly thing to do.  Ugh.  It really is a 50s fantasy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found it:</p>
<p>(Betsy Ricucci writes) <i>Before I was married, I never left the house looking bad . . . but you should have seen me in the house!  I didn’t bother freshening up, wearing makeup, or fixing my hair.  And I’m afraid I took those habits with me into marriage.  It took a close friend’s example and encouragement to help me change.  If I want my husband to desire me, I need to look desirable.  These things have become important to me because I want to treat Gary with real respect.<br />
 <br />
Women often pay less attention to their appearance after they get married.  <b>Yet our appearance is more important now than ever.  Most of our husbands work in an environment where they are surrounded by women striving to look attractive.</b>  We need to look attractive when they leave for work and when they come home.  Attractive undergarments and nightwear are also important.  It takes effort to look good, especially if you have small children.  There will inevitably be those crazy days when you barely get out of your robe.  But on the whole we need to attend to our appearance.  This is a tangible and meaningful way to express love and respect for our husbands. &#8211; Love That Lasts</i>, p. 149 (emphasis mine)</p>
<p>There are a lot of red flags in that passage &#8211; and in the entire book &#8211; but I was particularly struck by the comment about attractive women working with husbands in the workplace.  As though it&#8217;s some sort of competition to keep one&#8217;s husband&#8217;s attention.  You must be sexier than the women your husband work with, otherwise . . . it&#8217;s never said explicitly, but the obvious implication is that he will stray if you don&#8217;t keep your appearance up.</p>
<p>The lines about wearing attractive &#8220;underwear and nightwear&#8221; line up with what Julie said about how wives were told to shop for lingerie, etc.  And the passage clearly implies that wearing makeup around the house is the godly thing to do.  Ugh.  It really is a 50s fantasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Immel</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6674</link>
		<dc:creator>John Immel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6674</guid>
		<description>Freedom Fighter 
 
Dis-fellowshiped for staring a bible study… how rich is that?   Hahahah.  Yeah… imagine that … kicked out of church for encouraging folk to read the bible.  I do soooo love irony!
 
I think you are right… some folk are sarcastic, or bitter, or angry, or fat, or skinny, or lustful, or whatever…  That changes the commentary how exactly?
 
I love satire…  I’m ironic (some folk call it sarcastic) on purpose.  I am absurd to illustrate absurdity.  
 
I think Matthews comments about feral cats is a smoke screen.  And I couldn’t care less… I’ve been called worse and have come to relish the adjectives.  
 
Matthew is the one who crawled in to the pool, then he wants to cry foul when he gets dunked.  Kiddie pool is over by the slides…  this is the deep end, and you are swimming (this) shark.  These issues are FAR too serous and important for detractors to be able to dismiss with the wave of the magic “You are too mean and bitter” wand.  No one compelled him to write his comments.  (And I suspect that if his pastor found out that he posted they’d not be too pleased.)
 
Even if that isn’t true it doesn’t matter.  I refuse to let THEM determine offence and defense.  
Freedom Figher, you said is exactly correct:  “Truth is truth and the attitudes of the critic do NOT mitigate that truth.”   SGM and sundry defenders use this Ad Hominem argument with relentless precision.  I refuse to let them.  

FF said:  “I don’t think we need to fight against Matthew. We were all just like him at one point or another. What we need to do is pray that the Holy Spirit will remove the blinders from his eyes so that he can stop judging the messengers and start looking critically at the message here — which I think we can all safely say is a warning.”
 
Hummm….  Fighting against Matthew…  Pray….   Ok… I’m not trying to trivialize the sentiment.  And I respect what you are advocating.  Is there a spiritual element to this ongoing saga?  Of course.  By all means… pray.  I’m a faith man and can join the intercessions with the best of them. 
 
But here is the thing.  The whole of the New Testament was written to influence that very Holy Ghost inspired revelation to the minds of men.  Every book (This is me talking off the top of my head but I’m pretty sure I can make this scholastic case) was written in response to—some kind of--thinking. 
 
If the Holy Spirit was some magic fairy dust to correct bad human thinking… then why write the books?   Praying is not sufficient to the task, and in my Never-to-be-humble-opinion usually an excuse for intellectual passivity, and an unwillingness to make effective arguments. (Not an accusation to you Freedom Fighter, but a general observation)
 
Whatever, men have been charged with the intellectual defense of the Anointed Jesus and the Kingdom of God. 
 
The Holy Spirit is a SOURCE of knowledge (like the senses are a source of knowledge)  But the mind is the point of integration of said knowledge.  Logic is the practice of intellectual discipline, the exercise of intellectual Character.  Without it Men are lost.  
 
(I have a lot to say about his particular subject so it would be easy for me to Geek out on this conversation… )
 
Let me sum by saying the very battle we are in is a battle for the minds of men.  There is only one way to deal with men in this lifetime: Force—Ideas or Violence.  
 
So when I fight I am aiming an argument at people’s head.  What I have no patience for is folk who want to aim an argument at MY head and then absolve themselves of thinking when they are responded to.
 
This is so VERY SGM.  The Rank and Filers of the movement will bring out their intellectual pitch forks and pop guns in defense of these “Great men of Character,”  and then get all squeamish when they are confronted when someone responds with a Pershing missile.  “Oh you hit too hard.  Oh you are bitter.  Oh, you play to rough! Oh, I’m to tired.  Oh, I’m too busy.”   Which is really code for “Oh #$@! I have no clue what I’m talking about!”
 
And here is the thing. They have an obligation to know what they are talking about—every  single last one of them.  They don’t get to say: “I was just following orders.”  That didn’t work at Nuremburg and it won’t work on that last day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freedom Fighter<br />
 <br />
Dis-fellowshiped for staring a bible study… how rich is that?   Hahahah.  Yeah… imagine that … kicked out of church for encouraging folk to read the bible.  I do soooo love irony!<br />
 <br />
I think you are right… some folk are sarcastic, or bitter, or angry, or fat, or skinny, or lustful, or whatever…  That changes the commentary how exactly?<br />
 <br />
I love satire…  I’m ironic (some folk call it sarcastic) on purpose.  I am absurd to illustrate absurdity. <br />
 <br />
I think Matthews comments about feral cats is a smoke screen.  And I couldn’t care less… I’ve been called worse and have come to relish the adjectives. <br />
 <br />
Matthew is the one who crawled in to the pool, then he wants to cry foul when he gets dunked.  Kiddie pool is over by the slides…  this is the deep end, and you are swimming (this) shark.  These issues are FAR too serous and important for detractors to be able to dismiss with the wave of the magic “You are too mean and bitter” wand.  No one compelled him to write his comments.  (And I suspect that if his pastor found out that he posted they’d not be too pleased.)<br />
 <br />
Even if that isn’t true it doesn’t matter.  I refuse to let THEM determine offence and defense. <br />
Freedom Figher, you said is exactly correct:  “Truth is truth and the attitudes of the critic do NOT mitigate that truth.”   SGM and sundry defenders use this Ad Hominem argument with relentless precision.  I refuse to let them.  </p>
<p>FF said:  “I don’t think we need to fight against Matthew. We were all just like him at one point or another. What we need to do is pray that the Holy Spirit will remove the blinders from his eyes so that he can stop judging the messengers and start looking critically at the message here — which I think we can all safely say is a warning.”<br />
 <br />
Hummm….  Fighting against Matthew…  Pray….   Ok… I’m not trying to trivialize the sentiment.  And I respect what you are advocating.  Is there a spiritual element to this ongoing saga?  Of course.  By all means… pray.  I’m a faith man and can join the intercessions with the best of them.<br />
 <br />
But here is the thing.  The whole of the New Testament was written to influence that very Holy Ghost inspired revelation to the minds of men.  Every book (This is me talking off the top of my head but I’m pretty sure I can make this scholastic case) was written in response to—some kind of&#8211;thinking.<br />
 <br />
If the Holy Spirit was some magic fairy dust to correct bad human thinking… then why write the books?   Praying is not sufficient to the task, and in my Never-to-be-humble-opinion usually an excuse for intellectual passivity, and an unwillingness to make effective arguments. (Not an accusation to you Freedom Fighter, but a general observation)<br />
 <br />
Whatever, men have been charged with the intellectual defense of the Anointed Jesus and the Kingdom of God.<br />
 <br />
The Holy Spirit is a SOURCE of knowledge (like the senses are a source of knowledge)  But the mind is the point of integration of said knowledge.  Logic is the practice of intellectual discipline, the exercise of intellectual Character.  Without it Men are lost. <br />
 <br />
(I have a lot to say about his particular subject so it would be easy for me to Geek out on this conversation… )<br />
 <br />
Let me sum by saying the very battle we are in is a battle for the minds of men.  There is only one way to deal with men in this lifetime: Force—Ideas or Violence.  <br />
 <br />
So when I fight I am aiming an argument at people’s head.  What I have no patience for is folk who want to aim an argument at MY head and then absolve themselves of thinking when they are responded to.<br />
 <br />
This is so VERY SGM.  The Rank and Filers of the movement will bring out their intellectual pitch forks and pop guns in defense of these “Great men of Character,”  and then get all squeamish when they are confronted when someone responds with a Pershing missile.  “Oh you hit too hard.  Oh you are bitter.  Oh, you play to rough! Oh, I’m to tired.  Oh, I’m too busy.”   Which is really code for “Oh #$@! I have no clue what I’m talking about!”<br />
 <br />
And here is the thing. They have an obligation to know what they are talking about—every  single last one of them.  They don’t get to say: “I was just following orders.”  That didn’t work at Nuremburg and it won’t work on that last day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: work-in-progress</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6672</link>
		<dc:creator>work-in-progress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6672</guid>
		<description>John said, &lt;i&gt;&quot;Can you imagine the pressure these men and women must live under?  Endlessly suspicious of their partner if they are out of sight and within arms reach of the opposite sex.  The pathology of this whole dynamic takes my breath away.  Women have a DUTY to service their men on demand and a doctrinal expectation that every other woman represents a REAL threat to the marriage.  Women who feel no DUTY but raw sexual energy too service their paramours.   Who can compete with that?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;


There is a passage from Gary and Betsy Ricucci&#039;s book on marriage that basically says JUST that - that wives have to keep themselves attractive and service their husbands because there are women out there on the prowl trying to snare them with their looks, etc.  I&#039;ll see if I can dig it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John said, <i>&#8220;Can you imagine the pressure these men and women must live under?  Endlessly suspicious of their partner if they are out of sight and within arms reach of the opposite sex.  The pathology of this whole dynamic takes my breath away.  Women have a DUTY to service their men on demand and a doctrinal expectation that every other woman represents a REAL threat to the marriage.  Women who feel no DUTY but raw sexual energy too service their paramours.   Who can compete with that?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>There is a passage from Gary and Betsy Ricucci&#8217;s book on marriage that basically says JUST that &#8211; that wives have to keep themselves attractive and service their husbands because there are women out there on the prowl trying to snare them with their looks, etc.  I&#8217;ll see if I can dig it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Thinking</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6670</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6670</guid>
		<description>Matt:
&quot;Care Grope Leader&quot; is probably the funniest, most unfortunate typo I have ever laughed my head off over!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt:<br />
&#8220;Care Grope Leader&#8221; is probably the funniest, most unfortunate typo I have ever laughed my head off over!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Wondering</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6669</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6669</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be happy to open up about my agenda, if I had one. However, I wasn&#039;t specifically referring to your leadership positions within the church, but more inquiring about whether you would be willing to share the totality of the truth regarding your RELATIONSHIP with leadership. I think it would give all who post/read here a bit more clarity on where you stand.


Again, 
Just Wondering

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be happy to open up about my agenda, if I had one. However, I wasn&#8217;t specifically referring to your leadership positions within the church, but more inquiring about whether you would be willing to share the totality of the truth regarding your RELATIONSHIP with leadership. I think it would give all who post/read here a bit more clarity on where you stand.</p>
<p>Again, <br />
Just Wondering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Immel</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6667</link>
		<dc:creator>John Immel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6667</guid>
		<description>Julie... you are soooooo right. Brialliant.  I have more to offer but I want to get to Freedom Fighter ... give me a minute and i&#039;ll get back to you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie&#8230; you are soooooo right. Brialliant.  I have more to offer but I want to get to Freedom Fighter &#8230; give me a minute and i&#8217;ll get back to you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Geesling</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6666</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Geesling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6666</guid>
		<description>Just Wondering,
Well my name is Matthew not Matt.
I have never been a Care Grope Leader or even sat in for one at a care group.
I and my wife have been leaders for childcare, nursery - 4 year olds and I also was the sound team leader for a couple of years.
I have no aspirations to ever be in leadership.
We have been attending our Church for 16 years now.
&lt;strong&gt;Now &quot;Just Wondering&quot; would you like to open up your agenda?
&lt;/strong&gt;But please start by telling us/me who you Realy are. 
Just for clarity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just Wondering,<br />
Well my name is Matthew not Matt.<br />
I have never been a Care Grope Leader or even sat in for one at a care group.<br />
I and my wife have been leaders for childcare, nursery &#8211; 4 year olds and I also was the sound team leader for a couple of years.<br />
I have no aspirations to ever be in leadership.<br />
We have been attending our Church for 16 years now.<br />
<strong>Now &#8220;Just Wondering&#8221; would you like to open up your agenda?<br />
</strong>But please start by telling us/me who you Realy are.<br />
Just for clarity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Immel</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6665</link>
		<dc:creator>John Immel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6665</guid>
		<description>Canary… 

Thank you for your kinds words, before and now.  I haven’t been but a click away following along and talking to folk on the phone since this whole thing got rolling.  You all are far from inept at commentating on the content of SGM treatment.  If you were… they would still be ignoring what is coming off the blogs.  They are not ignoring the blogs precisely because so many people are voicing the same commentary in their own unique way.  
 
And what is more… it is the very individual human factor that is actually starting to unravel the bondage that so many folk have lived in. As this thread and sundry posts attest… did not one of our own have major breakthrough in her thinking because of a side conversation?  That is very powerful in my mind.  Each contribution to this conversation has served to unravel this entire Gordian knot.  
 
For heaven sake…. I took this cause to the forefront years ago… and suffered the same “Am I crazy!  Is it just me?” syndrome.  Hearing the stories and realizing the truth has been essential to my own sanity and health.  So whatever my particular skill set… never forget you all have done great work in bearing your soul and your mind to public scrutiny.  Trust me… this has major implications for the future.  I contend that SGM is the warm up round for this spiritual tyranny.  
 
(I will be posting more about this on my site (maybe somewhere else) soon)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canary… </p>
<p>Thank you for your kinds words, before and now.  I haven’t been but a click away following along and talking to folk on the phone since this whole thing got rolling.  You all are far from inept at commentating on the content of SGM treatment.  If you were… they would still be ignoring what is coming off the blogs.  They are not ignoring the blogs precisely because so many people are voicing the same commentary in their own unique way. <br />
 <br />
And what is more… it is the very individual human factor that is actually starting to unravel the bondage that so many folk have lived in. As this thread and sundry posts attest… did not one of our own have major breakthrough in her thinking because of a side conversation?  That is very powerful in my mind.  Each contribution to this conversation has served to unravel this entire Gordian knot. <br />
 <br />
For heaven sake…. I took this cause to the forefront years ago… and suffered the same “Am I crazy!  Is it just me?” syndrome.  Hearing the stories and realizing the truth has been essential to my own sanity and health.  So whatever my particular skill set… never forget you all have done great work in bearing your soul and your mind to public scrutiny.  Trust me… this has major implications for the future.  I contend that SGM is the warm up round for this spiritual tyranny. <br />
 <br />
(I will be posting more about this on my site (maybe somewhere else) soon)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julie</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6664</link>
		<dc:creator>julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6664</guid>
		<description>John, the way sex/marriage and gender roles play out in SGM is indeed very twisted.  The whole modesty checklist becomes this monstrous tool of judgement in the hands of women ( I was one) who bought into the whole thing hook, line and sinker.  Whenever a woman was unwilling to follow the rules, I viewed her pretty much as enemy #1.  She was dressing in an attractive way in front of my husband&#039;s eyes, dressing in a way that I was not allowed to.  I felt so completely unattractive to him, but then when you&#039;re trying to be a doormat you shouldn&#039;t be surprised when your man doesn&#039;t start drooling at the sight of you.  So SGM has a plan...strip women of any shred of self-respect and then beat men over the head when they mysteriously don&#039;t find their help-meet up to their level of intelligence and therefore unattractive.  Sex becomes animalistic, a mere physical act done as if we were all in some breeding program.  We were told how and when, how often , seduction methods, what tools to have on hand in our &#039;pleasure box&#039;, what our husband would prefer, how to shop for lingerie (that this was one thing our husbands would approve our spending money on), how being tired or sick or having been sexually abused in the past was NOT a biblical reason to refuse our husband.  God would bless us if we just were good little girls and did whatever our husbands little hearts desired.  Trouble is, my life felt more like cursed.  Of course I was a miserable failure at all this, try as I might (my husband still doesn&#039;t think I tried that hard!  that&#039;s how bad I was at it haha).  It&#039;s funny but the harder I tried the more angry and disatisfied my husband was.  Though SGM told him what he wanted in a wife, deep down he wanted a real woman.  And that&#039;s exactly what he&#039;s got now, and we are both much much happier both in the bedroom and out.  And might I add I now have a real man!   He doesn&#039;t scamper around at the foot of any man with his tail between his legs anymore.  He certainly doesn&#039;t defend &#039;manly&#039; leaders against injured women and children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, the way sex/marriage and gender roles play out in SGM is indeed very twisted.  The whole modesty checklist becomes this monstrous tool of judgement in the hands of women ( I was one) who bought into the whole thing hook, line and sinker.  Whenever a woman was unwilling to follow the rules, I viewed her pretty much as enemy #1.  She was dressing in an attractive way in front of my husband&#8217;s eyes, dressing in a way that I was not allowed to.  I felt so completely unattractive to him, but then when you&#8217;re trying to be a doormat you shouldn&#8217;t be surprised when your man doesn&#8217;t start drooling at the sight of you.  So SGM has a plan&#8230;strip women of any shred of self-respect and then beat men over the head when they mysteriously don&#8217;t find their help-meet up to their level of intelligence and therefore unattractive.  Sex becomes animalistic, a mere physical act done as if we were all in some breeding program.  We were told how and when, how often , seduction methods, what tools to have on hand in our &#8216;pleasure box&#8217;, what our husband would prefer, how to shop for lingerie (that this was one thing our husbands would approve our spending money on), how being tired or sick or having been sexually abused in the past was NOT a biblical reason to refuse our husband.  God would bless us if we just were good little girls and did whatever our husbands little hearts desired.  Trouble is, my life felt more like cursed.  Of course I was a miserable failure at all this, try as I might (my husband still doesn&#8217;t think I tried that hard!  that&#8217;s how bad I was at it haha).  It&#8217;s funny but the harder I tried the more angry and disatisfied my husband was.  Though SGM told him what he wanted in a wife, deep down he wanted a real woman.  And that&#8217;s exactly what he&#8217;s got now, and we are both much much happier both in the bedroom and out.  And might I add I now have a real man!   He doesn&#8217;t scamper around at the foot of any man with his tail between his legs anymore.  He certainly doesn&#8217;t defend &#8216;manly&#8217; leaders against injured women and children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Wondering</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-3/#comment-6663</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6663</guid>
		<description>Matt Geesling wrote:


&quot;One last thing to all who do read these posts, I use my real name and these are my comments.  
Anonymity has no place in my life as a man in Christ.


So what I am saying is that sometimes the truth is being told, just not all of it.&quot;


Matt,


I wonder if you might be persuaded, for the sake of clarity for all reading, and not just those in Gilbert who know you, to reduce your &quot;anonymity&quot; and to tell &quot;all of the truth&quot; regarding your identity as it pertains to church leadership.


Just Wondering
 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Geesling wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;One last thing to all who do read these posts, I use my real name and these are my comments.  <br />
Anonymity has no place in my life as a man in Christ.</p>
<p>So what I am saying is that sometimes the truth is being told, just not all of it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Matt,</p>
<p>I wonder if you might be persuaded, for the sake of clarity for all reading, and not just those in Gilbert who know you, to reduce your &#8220;anonymity&#8221; and to tell &#8220;all of the truth&#8221; regarding your identity as it pertains to church leadership.</p>
<p>Just Wondering<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Immel</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-2/#comment-6662</link>
		<dc:creator>John Immel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6662</guid>
		<description>Ladies…
 
Canary, Stunned, Singing Cook.  (I think you are all ladies and I am sorry if I missed anyone who contributed to the conversation… it was really good)  I know this part of the conversation isn’t on point but I thought how you all commented on the treatment of women fascinating. 
 
I never thought the division of the sexes to be disrespectful.  But the more I think about it the more I think you are correct.  I think this a profoundly dehumanizing standard of interaction.  To marginalize someone merely because of their gender and the potential threat or potential perceived impropriety?  This is cannot be a God standard. 
 
And what is more, I think this preoccupation is a manifestation of profound weakness. 
 
This whole, women over here and men over there—unless they are heavily chaperoned—practice is offered up as a virtue, as an extra righteous display.  But what does it really say about the character of a man who can not engage in a social conversation without sinning?  As if a few minutes spent alone with the opposite sex is tantamount to heading to the storage closet and ripping off each others cloths?  Or maybe, in a man’s case, heading to the restroom to… oh never mind. 
 
What does that necessitate?  What does this presume?  That NO one has the capacity of self control?  That all people have zero values?  
 
Even more insidious, this mindset presumes that married men and women can never REALLY trust their mate, and encouraging them to be threatened by the most innocuous social interaction.  
 
Can you imagine the pressure these men and women must live under?  Endlessly suspicious of their partner if they are out of sight and within arms reach of the opposite sex.  The pathology of this whole dynamic takes my breath away.  Women have a DUTY to service their men on demand and a doctrinal expectation that every other woman represents a REAL threat to the marriage.  Women who feel no DUTY but raw sexual energy too service their paramours.   Who can compete with that?
 
OMG!!!  It is no wonder SGM must forever preach masculinity.  Imagine having to arouse your partner with DUTY, and in the next breath admit that I am … uh … inches … errr…. away from fornication with any an all comers in the immediate vicinity. 
 
What that really says is this: “Dear, I love you but I find you sexually boring.  Do your duty, because that woman over there is HOT.  Keep me from sinning.  Get your cloths off.”      
 
Hahahah…. WOW!  
 
The elements of this whole dynamic take my breath away.  The dynamic encompasses presumptions about Holiness, trust, the driving force of Character, what sex amounts to… This is so warped that it takes my breath away.  
 
A profound misunderstanding of holiness.  (Holiness is not the ABSENCE of temptation but the power to stand in the face of temptation and not succumb.)
 
An unmitigated suspicion of ones mate. (If I really didn’t believe that my mate was WITH me… I will never live under that pressure again)
 
Character is a function of group participation.  (Change is impossible, the group enforces all conduct.)
 
A stunning misunderstanding of what sex really amounts too.  (The moment when two people get to see a reflection of INDIVIDUL value in the face of their partner; a partner who GETS exactly what that value is and wants to celebrate it.) 
 
&gt;this is me shaking my head&lt;
 
Part of me feels for these little boys with such a lack of self mastery.  Then the other part of me remembers that it is mostly their fault. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladies…<br />
 <br />
Canary, Stunned, Singing Cook.  (I think you are all ladies and I am sorry if I missed anyone who contributed to the conversation… it was really good)  I know this part of the conversation isn’t on point but I thought how you all commented on the treatment of women fascinating.<br />
 <br />
I never thought the division of the sexes to be disrespectful.  But the more I think about it the more I think you are correct.  I think this a profoundly dehumanizing standard of interaction.  To marginalize someone merely because of their gender and the potential threat or potential perceived impropriety?  This is cannot be a God standard.<br />
 <br />
And what is more, I think this preoccupation is a manifestation of profound weakness.<br />
 <br />
This whole, women over here and men over there—unless they are heavily chaperoned—practice is offered up as a virtue, as an extra righteous display.  But what does it really say about the character of a man who can not engage in a social conversation without sinning?  As if a few minutes spent alone with the opposite sex is tantamount to heading to the storage closet and ripping off each others cloths?  Or maybe, in a man’s case, heading to the restroom to… oh never mind.<br />
 <br />
What does that necessitate?  What does this presume?  That NO one has the capacity of self control?  That all people have zero values? <br />
 <br />
Even more insidious, this mindset presumes that married men and women can never REALLY trust their mate, and encouraging them to be threatened by the most innocuous social interaction.  <br />
 <br />
Can you imagine the pressure these men and women must live under?  Endlessly suspicious of their partner if they are out of sight and within arms reach of the opposite sex.  The pathology of this whole dynamic takes my breath away.  Women have a DUTY to service their men on demand and a doctrinal expectation that every other woman represents a REAL threat to the marriage.  Women who feel no DUTY but raw sexual energy too service their paramours.   Who can compete with that?<br />
 <br />
OMG!!!  It is no wonder SGM must forever preach masculinity.  Imagine having to arouse your partner with DUTY, and in the next breath admit that I am … uh … inches … errr…. away from fornication with any an all comers in the immediate vicinity.<br />
 <br />
What that really says is this: “Dear, I love you but I find you sexually boring.  Do your duty, because that woman over there is HOT.  Keep me from sinning.  Get your cloths off.”      <br />
 <br />
Hahahah…. WOW! <br />
 <br />
The elements of this whole dynamic take my breath away.  The dynamic encompasses presumptions about Holiness, trust, the driving force of Character, what sex amounts to… This is so warped that it takes my breath away. <br />
 <br />
A profound misunderstanding of holiness.  (Holiness is not the ABSENCE of temptation but the power to stand in the face of temptation and not succumb.)<br />
 <br />
An unmitigated suspicion of ones mate. (If I really didn’t believe that my mate was WITH me… I will never live under that pressure again)<br />
 <br />
Character is a function of group participation.  (Change is impossible, the group enforces all conduct.)<br />
 <br />
A stunning misunderstanding of what sex really amounts too.  (The moment when two people get to see a reflection of INDIVIDUL value in the face of their partner; a partner who GETS exactly what that value is and wants to celebrate it.)<br />
 <br />
&gt;this is me shaking my head&lt;<br />
 <br />
Part of me feels for these little boys with such a lack of self mastery.  Then the other part of me remembers that it is mostly their fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-2/#comment-6661</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6661</guid>
		<description>Stunned,

Sounds like you are seeing a &quot;winner&quot;!  Trust is so important in a relationship. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stunned,</p>
<p>Sounds like you are seeing a &#8220;winner&#8221;!  Trust is so important in a relationship. <img src='http://sgmrefuge.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almost an Ex sgc-er</title>
		<link>http://sgmrefuge.com/2008/07/15/sgm-polity/comment-page-2/#comment-6660</link>
		<dc:creator>Almost an Ex sgc-er</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgmrefuge.com/?p=55#comment-6660</guid>
		<description>Stunned, are you &quot;dating&quot; or &quot;courting&quot;  hahahahaaha! got-cha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stunned, are you &#8220;dating&#8221; or &#8220;courting&#8221;  hahahahaaha! got-cha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
